(TeaParty.org Exclusive) – Conservative filmmaker Dinesh D’Souza, the man behind the explosive “2000 Mules” documentary that reveals how Democrats stole the 2020 presidential election through voter fraud, has issued a debate challenge to former attorney general Bill Barr after he laughed about the contents of the film.
The reaction, which clearly got beneath D’Souza’s skin, came during a video deposition featured in a hearing Monday by the House Select Committee concerning the events that transpired at the Capitol building on Jan. 6, 2021.
“My opinion then, and my opinion now, is that the election was not stolen by fraud,” Barr stated during the deposition.
“And I haven’t seen anything since the election that changes my mind, including the ‘2000 Mules’ movie,” he went on to say before laughing.
According to a report from WND, D’Souza then reacted to Barr through a tweet he posted on his Twitter account, saying, “I’d like to invite Bill Barr to a public debate on election fraud. Given his blithe chuckling dismissal of #2000Mules this should be easy for him. What do you say, Barr? Do you dare to back up your belly laughs with arguments that can withstand rebuttal and cross-examination?”
The level of ignorance displayed by Bill Barr here is truly stunning. He doesn’t seem to understand the very concept of geotracking. I’ll address this in detail on my podcast tomorrow https://t.co/zfEWm5gVCx
— Dinesh D'Souza (@DineshDSouza) June 13, 2022
“The True the Vote investigators used cellphone location data and surveillance video to uncover what they describe as a highly coordinated operation in key battleground states carried out by left-wing groups that collected mail-in ballots and paid ‘mules’ to stuff them in unattended drop boxes, typically in the middle of the night,” WND stated.
Barr then went on to argue during his deposition that the Georgia Bureau of Investigation was “unimpressed” with the evidence produced by geotracking. The director of the GBI stated in a letter back in September sent to Gregg Phillips, a data analyst and election intelligence specialist working as an investigator for True the Vote, that the data “while curious, does not rise to the level of probable cause that a crime has been committed.”
Really seems like these people are doing their best to bury the truth about what happened during the 2020 election, doesn’t it? They don’t want the people of this country to know that the election was rigged, that the powers that be silenced the voices of American citizens, and are working to ensure that Democrats stay in power for a long, long time.
Barr came right out and stated that the “cellphone data is singularly unimpressive.”
“I mean, basically, if you take 2 million cellphones and figure out where they are in a big city like Atlanta or wherever, just by definition you are going to find that many hundreds of them have passed by and spent time in the vicinity of these boxes,” he explained.
“And the premise if you go by five boxes or whatever it was that that’s a mule is just indefensible,” he added.
Catherine Engelbrecht, the founder of True the Vote, also reacted to the comments Barr made during his deposition during an interview Monday on Steve Bannon’s program, “War Room.”
Engelbrecht revealed that Barr never reached out to her organization to find out what the group had uncovered before reaching a judgment.
“We are perilously close to losing that which binds us together, that free and fair vote,” she went on to say to host Steve Bannon. “I’m disappointed to see Bill Barr do it (but) not surprised. It’s been our experience with law enforcement to this point.”
Engelbrecht then stated that with state and federal law enforcement officials “proving to be absent,” True the Vote will be working closely with sheriffs all over the nation who are in the process of following up on the evidence.
“In a ‘fact check,’ the Associated Press concluded the True the Vote analysis was ‘flawed’ because cellphone tracking isn’t accurate enough. D’Souza argued Monday on Twitter that for an alleged ‘mule,’ or ballot trafficker, to be counted, the threshold was to have visited 10 different drop boxes during the election cycle,” the WND report stated.
“Is there anyone competent in cell phone geotracking who will defend what Bill Barr said?” D’Souza went on to ask. “He insists that random people in a busy city going past ballot dropboxes cannot be distinguished from mules who each go on routes and stop specifically at 10 or more dropboxes. Is this true?”
The True the Vote organization also managed to get their hands on 4 million minutes of surveillance footage from drop boxes thanks to public records requests.
Is there anyone competent in cell phone geotracking who will defend what Bill Barr said? He insists that random people in a busy city going past ballot dropboxes cannot be distinguished from mules who each go on routes and stop specifically at 10 or more dropboxes. Is this true?
— Dinesh D'Souza (@DineshDSouza) June 13, 2022
Who else would love to see a debate between D’Souza and Barr? Let’s hope it happens and the truth is presented to a mass audience.
Copyright 2022. TeaParty.org