TOP SCIENTISTS: COVID Shot 100 Times Likelier To Cause Serious Injury Than Prevent It

(TeaParty.org Exclusive) – Ever since the push began for the coronavirus vaccine, folks who have more than one operational brain cell have been warning people against being so gung-ho to take it, as it was being rushed through approval processes without the appropriate amount of testing to determine if it was truly safe. A lot of Americans bought into the government’s propaganda campaign concerning the vaccine and started getting pumped with numerous shots to protect them against an illness that has a 99 percent survival rate.

It did not take long for things to take a rather dark turn. Cases of young, healthy men experiencing heart issues due to the jab started popping up all over the place. Then people started dying from bad reactions to the ingredients in the vaccine. All the while, the government continued to push vaccine mandates and suppress the information concerning the adverse effects those who took the shot were experiencing.

And now, according to a new report from the Daily Sceptic, a study has come to the conclusion that COVID vaccine mandates for universities are unethical due to the fact that the vaccines are actually 100 times more likely to harm or injure an individual than preventing him from catching or being hospitalized by the coronavirus. In other words, the vaccine is useless.

“The study, whose authors include Dr. Kevin Bardosh, a recipient of funding from the pro-vaccination Wellcome Trust led by Sir Jeremy Farrar, and Dr. Tracy Beth Høeg of the Florida Department of Health, presents a risk-benefit assessment of booster vaccines among people of student age and provides five ethical arguments against mandates,” the report stated.

“The researchers estimate that 22,000-30,000 previously uninfected adults aged 18-29 must be boosted with an mRNA vaccine to prevent just one COVID-19 hospitalisation. In the study, which is currently undergoing peer-review, the authors analyse CDC and reported adverse event data and find that booster mandates are likely to cause a net expected harm. They estimate that for every COVID-19 hospitalisation prevented in previously uninfected young adults, 18 to 98 serious adverse events will occur, including 1.7 to 3.0 booster-associated myocarditis cases in males, and 1,373 to 3,234 cases of serious injury which interferes with daily activities,” the report revealed.

The authors of the study, which will no doubt have their findings suppressed by the powers that be who still, for their own sinister purposes, want you to keep taking the jab, went on to say that given the high level of natural immunity that follows an infection of the coronavirus that is now present in the population, the risk-benefit profile for the vaccine is even less favorable than it was before.

Here are the reasons the study’s authors say that the university booster mandates are unethical:

1. No formal risk-benefit assessment exists for the age group;

2. Vaccine mandates may result in a net expected harm to individual young people;

3. Mandates are not proportionate: expected harms are not outweighed by public health benefits given the modest and transient effectiveness of vaccines against transmission;

4. U.S. mandates violate the reciprocity principle because rare serious vaccine-related harms will not be reliably compensated due to gaps in current vaccine injury schemes; and

5. Mandates create wider social harms.

The folks involved in conducting the study do give consideration to things such as a desire for socialization and safety, but pop holes in the idea that these arguments are strong or have abundant scientific support.

Dr. Vinay Prasad of the University of California, Dr. Martin A. Makary and Dr. Stefan Baral of Johns Hopkins University are the medical professionals who were involved in the study. There was a previous intervention back in February of this year that featured many of these same doctors and was published in BMJ Global Health, which took a very strong ethical stance against folks being coerced into taking the vaccine, along with opposing vaccine passports.

“It’s been clear for some time that the cost-benefit assessment of the vaccines will not be favourable for young people. But with leading scientists, including some funded by pro-vaccination organisations like the Wellcome Trust, now putting the case in top journals, hopefully the message will get through to politicians and administrators, especially in America, who continue to impose vaccine requirements on young adults,” the Daily Sceptic reported.

The bottom line here is that what remaining COVID vaccine mandates are in place — looking at you Department of Defense — need to be tossed out immediately. Evidence strongly suggests that the vaccine is pretty much useless, therefore, it should not be mandated that someone take it, especially when the most effective weapon we have against this menace is natural immunity.

Copyright 2022. TeaParty.org

Overturn The Election

You may also like...

2 COMMENTS

  1. We the American People wonder what is the desired outcome of this administration to mandate a shot that has required the term “vaccine” to be has been down graded or changed by the CDC’s definition of vaccine. I believe we the People should down grade the CDC to a flim-flam waste of our money.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here